Los Angeles Drunk Driving Attorney

Meet Scott R. Spindel, Esq.

Los Angeles Drunk Driving Attorney - Scott R. SpindelScott Spindel Los Angeles Drunk Driving Attorney, is the founding member of the law firm and has extensive courtroom and trial experience, having handled drunk driving and criminal cases and trials in throughout Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Imperial, Kern, and Santa Barbara and Sacramento counties.

While attending Thomas Jefferson School of Law, Mr. Spindel found his calling in the field of criminal defense and focused his attention in this field as a clerk at the San Diego County Public Defenders office and a Judicial Extern in the Chambers of the Honorable Patricia Benke of the 4 th District Court of Appeal. In the Public Defenders Office, Los Angeles drunk driving attorney Scott Spindel worked in all areas of criminal defense, including assisting in the trial defense of clients charged with murder and crimes under the 3-strikes law.

After graduating law school I worked in the field of criminal trial and appellate defense and in September 2000 founded the Law Offices of Scott R. Spindel with one simple goal: Provide the best defense and representation possible at a reasonable cost.

In order to provide the "best defense", I have educated and associated myself with the top organizations and experts specializing in the fields of drunk driving & criminal defense. I am a graduate from the National College for DUI Defense (Summer Session 2003), have attended national conventions of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and completed training and certification in the maintenance and operation of the DataMaster breath machine from the manufacturer (National Patent Analytic Systems, Mansfield, Ohio, January 2004). In order to better represent you, I have been certified in the training and administration of Standardized Field Sobriety Tests and completed advanced training which allowed him to become one of the only certified Instructors, in Southern California (Student Course: Las Vegas Nevada, 2003 and Instructors Course: Nashville, Tennessee, 2004). Basically, I have received, the same, and in most cases more, training in the operation of breath testing devices and field sobriety tests than the officer that stopped and possibly arrested you in this case.

Most importantly, when you come to our office for your free consultation you meet directly with me and when you leave as my client you know that I am the only DUI defense attorney who will be representing you in resolving your case with your needs and concerns because I u nderstand how important your case is and give it the priority it deserves.

We are here 24/7/365 and accept all collect calls.

I hope to see and hear from you soon.

Los Angeles Drunk Driving Attorney, Scott R. Spindel, Esq.


for more detail visit Los Angeles Drunk Driving Attorney

California Lemon Law

California Lemon Law Attorney

At the law firm of Law & Kolakowski we focus our practice exclusively on representing people with California lemon carand auto fraud claims. For over 20 years we have been helping clients throughout California, including the counties of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Riverside, Yolo, San Bernardino, Santa Clara, San Diego, Sonoma, Orange, Ventura, Sacramento, Imperial and Napa. As lemon law attorneys we are committed to offering fast, friendly, and experienced service to every one of our clients. We also offer free consultations to review and evaluate your legal options. To learn more about us and our experiences, see the attorney profiles below.

Douglas D. Law

Douglas D. Law has been practicing law since 1983 and handling lemon law cases since 1988. Mr. Law received his undergraduate degree in economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara (B.A. with Honors 1978) and his law degree from the University of San Diego, School of Law (J.D. 1983.) While attending law school interned for the Center for Public Interest Law under Professor Robert Fellmeth an original member of "Nadar's Raiders."

For over 20 years Mr. Law has successfully handled thousands of lemon law cases under California's lemon law, known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, from simple letters, through jury trials, to the courts of appeal all the way to the California Supreme Court. Mr. Law was the trail and appellate attorney in the precedent setting cases Foreman v. National R.V., Inc. (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1072 and Robertson v. Fleetwood Travel Trailers (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 785, review denied, California Supreme Court (2007) Cal. LEXIS 1443. Mr Law was also the principal trial attorney in the landmark case Thompson v. 10,000 RV Sales, Inc. (2005) 130 Cal.App. 4th 950. These cases established important legal rights for California consumers and are regularly cited by California courts for the principles they stand for.

Mr. Law was also one of the founding members of the California Association of Lemon Attorneys in 1990. For many years, this group of pioneering lemon law lawyers met on a continual basis to discuss issues arising in lemon law and to meet the tactics and strategies employed by manufacturers to defeat lemon law claims.

Mr. Law has appeared and testified before the California legislature regarding amendments to the California's lemon law and worked with legislators to incorporate strong provisions in to the Song-Beverly Act. Mr. Law has appeared in numerous television and radio broadcasts featuring his cases as well as topics of general interest to consumers. Mr. Law is proud of his record representing California consumers throughout the state against companies with superior financial resources.

Leonard M. Kolakowski

Leonard M. Kolakowski earned his law degree from the University of San Diego, School of Law in 1980. That same year, Mr. Kolakowski began his career in the field of business litigation for law firm of Ralph Gano Miller, APLC.

After 5 years of practice with Mr. Miller's firm, Mr. Kolakowski, became assistant general counsel for Kaypro Computer Corporation. After 3 years with Kaypro Corporation, Mr. Kolakowski was recruited to become general counsel for the franchisor of Soup Exchange restaurants.

In serving as in-house counsel, Mr. Kolakowski, in addition to consulting with corporate officers and directors, supervised each company's outside litigation counsel.

After 7 years with Soup Exchange, Mr. Kolakowski returned to his roots in litigation by practicing in the field of Lemon Law.

In October of 2006, Mr. Kolakowski joined in partnership with Mr. Law to form the firm of Law & Kolakowski.

In addition to voluminous lemon law cases, the firm of Law & Kolakowski also has experience in handling hundreds of automobile fraud, leasing and financing cases under statutes such as California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act and Automobile Sales Finance Act and the federal Odometer Act.

Law & Kolakowski is a firm devoted solely to representing consumers. Mr. Law and Mr. Kolakowski are not only members of the state and local bar associations but are also members of the National Association of Consumer Advocates. Quality results, ethically achieved and excellent client relationships are the goals of Law & Kolakowski.

If your vehicle is a lemon in California, it doesn't matter if you live in San Diego, Fresno, Los Angeles San Francisco, Merced or Orange County, or whether you need a lemon law lawyer in San Jose, Riverside, Sacramento, San Rafael, or San Bernardino or you are seeking a lemon law attorney in Silicon Valley, Santa Clara, Long Beach, Modesto, Anaheim, Victorville, Stockton, Santa Ana, El Centro, Irvine, Chula Vista, Temecula or other location in CA. For free help with your California Lemon Law Case call us Toll Free at 1-877-348-1152 or use this Contact Form.

California Auto Fraud Attorneys

California Auto Fraud Attorneys

Many California consumers are victims of automobile fraud and do not even know it. The best schemes are those which are hard or impossible for a buyer to detect. We have handled many cases where the buyers had no idea they had been victims of a fraudulent scheme.

Auto fraud occurs when a retail seller misrepresents or fails to disclose important facts in a sale transaction involving a new or used vehicle. The fraud may involve the history of the vehicle, monetary disclosures in the contract, or simply the way the sale documentation was completed.

There are several types of auto fraud, including: odometer / rollback Fraud, prior accidents, prior history / demonstrators / rental vehicles, undisclosed negative equity / upside down on trade-in vehicles, buyer's guide / used vehicles, payment packing, copies of signed documents and credit applications,forgery, receipt of Spanish translated contracts, deferred down payments and hold check agreements, new and used vehicle disclosures, pre-sale availability of written warranties.

We handle all automobile fraud claims on a contingency basis. If we are unable to recover compensation for you and your vehicle, we will not charge attorneys fees.

Law & Kolakowski, located in San Diego, California, has been providing personal service and aggressive representation to victims of auto fraud for over 22 years. Our auto fraud lawyers counsel clients wanting compensation for their motor vehicles throughout Southern California, including Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernadino, San Diego, Orange, and Imperial counties.

If you have been lied to or cheated by an auto dealership or manufacturer, or would like us to review your transaction to see if you have been a victim, contact our California auto fraud attorneys at Law & Kolakowski to schedule a free initial consultation or fill out the easy free case evaluation form and send it to us. This service is free.


Helping clients in all cities of Southern California, including San Diego, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, and El Centro, CA.

Lemon Trucks


San diego lemon truck fraud


Have you purchased a truck that is a lemon? California lemon truck attorneys Law & Kolakowski may be able to help. If you have purchased one of the following lemon trucks below, call us for a free consultation.

  • Ford Ranger
  • Ford F- Series
  • Ford F-150
  • Ford F-250
  • Ford F-350
  • Ford F-450
  • Ford Super Duty 250
  • Ford Super Duty 350
  • Ford E-Series
  • Ford SD 250
  • Ford SD 350

  • Dodge Ram
  • Dodge Ram Series
  • Dodge Ram 1500
  • Dodge Ram 2500
  • Dodge Caravan
  • Dodge Caravan Van
  • Dodger Dakota
  • Dodge Grand Caravan
  • Dodge Sprinter Wagon

  • GMC Canyon
  • GMC Savana
  • GMC Sierra 1500
  • GMC Sierra 2500
  • GMC Sierra 3500

  • Cadillac EXT

  • Chevrolet Avalanche
  • Chevrolet Silverado 1500
  • Chevrolet Silverado 2500
  • Chevrolet Silverado 2500 HD
  • Chevrolet Silverado 3500
  • Chevrolet Silverado 3500 HD
  • Chevrolet Express
  • Chevrolet Express Van
  • Chevrolet Express
  • Chevrolet Uplander
  • Chevrolet Colorado

  • Nissan Frontier Crew Cab
  • Nissan Frontier King Cab
  • Nissan Titan Crew Cab
  • Nissan Titan Crew Cab (2008.5)
  • Nissan Titan King Cab
  • Nissan Titan King Cab (2008.5)

  • Toyota Tacoma
  • Toyota Tacoma 4X2
  • Toyota Tacoma 4X4
  • Toyota Tundra
  • Toyota Tundra CrewMax 4X2
  • Toyota Tundra CrewMax 4X4
  • Toyota Tundra Double Cab 4X2
  • Toyota Tundra Double Cab 4X4
  • Toyota Tundra Regular Cab 4X2
  • Toyota Tundra Regular Cab 4X4
  • Toyota Tundra 4X2
  • Toyota Tundra 4X4

  • Chrysler Town & Country
  • Chrysler Town & Country LWB
  • Chrysler Town & Country SWB

  • Honda Ridgeline

  • Mitsubishi Raider

  • Lincoln Mark LT

  • Mazda B-Series

We serve ALL of California including San Diego, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange County, El Centro, Palm Springs, Palm Desert and anywhere in CA.

Bickel Law Firm

:: San Diego Lemon Law Attorneys
The Bickel Law Firm, Inc.
1950 Symphony Towers, 750 B St.
San Diego, California 92101

Our primary office is based out of San Diego, and we are pleased to offer our autoLemon Law services to all San Diego County residents. Although our office is located centrally in downtown San Diego, we encourage inquiries from North County, East County, the South Bay, and San Diego County's rural communities.

Our free consultation can be conducted either in person or over the phone. For those who would prefer a telephone consultation, documents can be submitted for attorney review by email, fax, or regular mail. The majority of our San Diego Lemon Lawcases are resolved in which a meeting between lawyer and client is not required.

:: San Diego California Lemon Law Overview

:: Lemon Law San Diego - FAQs

:: Lemon Law San Diego - Attorneys Fees

:: California Lemon Law Lawyers Outside of San Diego

For more details visit Law firm

Drunk Driving Lawyer

Los Angeles Drunk Driving Lawyer

Scott Spindel is the founding member of the law firm and has extensive courtroom and trial experience, having handled drunk driving and criminal cases and trials in throughout Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Imperial, Kern, and Santa Barbara and Sacramento counties.

While attending Thomas Jefferson School of Law, Mr. Spindel found his calling in the field of criminal defense and focused his attention in this field as a clerk at the San Diego County Public Defenders office and a Judicial Extern in the Chambers of the Honorable Patricia Benke of the 4 th District Court of Appeal. In the Public Defenders Office, Mr. Spindel worked in all areas of criminal defense, including assisting in the trial defense of clients charged with murder and crimes under the 3-strikes law.
Law info

In order to provide the "best defense", I have educated and associated myself with the top organizations and experts specializing in the fields of drunk driving & criminal defense. I am a graduate from the National College for DUI Defense (Summer Session 2003), have attended national conventions of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and completed training and certification in the maintenance and operation of the DataMaster breath machine from the manufacturer (National Patent Analytic Systems, Mansfield, Ohio, January 2004). In order to better represent you, I have been certified in the training and administration of Standardized Field Sobriety Tests and completed advanced training which allowed him to become one of the only certified Instructors, in Southern California (Student Course: Las Vegas Nevada, 2003 and Instructors Course: Nashville, Tennessee, 2004). Basically, I have received, the same, and in most cases more, training in the operation of breath testing devices and field sobriety tests than the officer that stopped and possibly arrested you in this case.
For more detail visit

LOS ANGELES DRUNK DRIVING LAWYER

LOS ANGELES DRUNK DRIVING LAWYER

Finding the best Los Angeles Drunk Driving Lawyer can be a tall task for anyone in trouble. If arrested for Driving under the influence (DWI, DUI), you are facing some serious consequences with the Los Angeles authorities as well as the State of California. These consequences include losing your driver’s license, increased insurance rates and even worse jail time. If convicted, the criminal record can follow you for the rest of your life and the record could effect your employment. If you or your family member needs help, start aggressively researching the best Los Angeles Drunk Driving Lawyers around or you may find yourself in a heap of trouble.

The State of California and the County of Los Angeles will have to prove more than just your blood alcohol level to obtain a conviction. There are issues that skillful Los Angeles Drunk Driving Lawyers can challenge:

  • Improper actions by the arresting officer,
  • Failure to properly explain your rights,
  • The officer operating the equipment was not certified to do so,
  • Poorly maintained or defective equipment used to test your alcohol level.

Los Angeles DUI / DWI arrests activate two separate cases: In court, and at the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Although both cases are extremely serious, with the DMV case being far more time-sensitive. Motorists accused of drunk driving in Los Angeles have only 10 days from the date of their DUI / DWI arrest to request a hearing with the DMV. Anyone arrested for DUI or DWI in Los Angeles who doesn’t request a hearing within 10 days will have his or her driver’s license suspended automatically on the 30th day following their drunk driving arrest.

The second count in Los Angeles, known as the “per se” charge, concentrates on whether the driver’s blood alcohol content (BAC) was .08 percent or greater. Whether the motorist seemed to be driving perfectly before the traffic stop or performed field sobriety tests with textbook precision doesn’t matter with this count. It is a charge that is based purely on body chemistry.

Getting arrested for DUI / DWI in Los Angeles can have life-changing consequences, so it’s critical to have a Los Angeles Drunk Driving Lawyer with experience defending both misdemeanor and felony DUI / DWI charges on the driver’s side. A skilled and competent Los Angeles Drunk Driving Lawyer who concentrates on drunk driving cases can provide a free DUI consultation and develop a proven DUI / DWI defense strategy designed to keep negative consequences to a minimum (such as jail time, loss of driving privileges, fines and penalties).

fore more detail visit Lawer

San Diego Drunk Driving Q & A


The San Diego criminal defense lawyers at Kerry L. Steigerwalt and Associates are familiar with many possible DUI defenses and questions:

Who was Driving?
Was there Probable cause?
Were you read your Miranda Rights?
Were you given implied consent warnings?
Were you assumed to be under the influence?
Faulty tests create a skewed blood-alcohol concentration?
Were you tested during the absorptive phase?
Was the proper protocol followed during the blood-alcohol testing?

If you have been charged with drunk driving, contact the San Diego Criminal Defense Law Firm of Kerry L. Steigerwalt & Associates today to review your case!


Who was Driving?


The prosecution must prove that the defendant was in fact the one driving the vehicle. In a case where there are no witnesses to an accident, intoxication is not enough.

Was there Probable cause?
There must be evidence provided that the officer had probable cause to stop, detain and arrest.

Were you read your Miranda Rights?
If the Miranda rights were not given at the appropriate time, incriminating statements may be concealed.

Were you given implied consent warnings?
In some states (including California), if a chemical test was refused or given incorrectly, and you were not advised of the consequences of this, it may be a reason to invalidate a DMV license suspension based upon the refusal to provide a breath/blood sample.

Were you assumed to be under the influence?
The officer's observations and opinions as to what the officer considers as "failing" can be questioned. For example, the circumstances under which the field sobriety tests were given. Witnesses can testify that you appeared to be sober.

Faulty tests created a skewed blood-alcohol concentration?
There exists a wide range of potential problems with blood, breath or urine testing. Many different defects in analysis can be brought out in cross-examination of the state's expert witness.

Were you tested during the absorptive phase?
The blood, breath or urine test will be unreliable if done while you are still actively absorbing alcohol. It can take thirty minutes to three hours for full absorption. If there is food that has not yet digested, this could be delayed. Because of this, inaccurate test results is very possible.

Was the protocol followed during the blood-alcohol testing?
The prosecution must prove that the blood, breath or urine test complied with state requirements.

If you or someone you love has been charged with a DUI or a DUI-related offense, you need to act quickly and contact the San Diego Criminal Defense Lawyers at Kerry L. Steigerwalt and Associates immediately. If you delay you risk putting your freedom, property, and livelihood in jeopardy, and every second you hesitate is less time for our attorneys to help protect your rights. Contact us today!


for more detail visit Arrested Not Guilty

White Collar Crimes


The term "white collar crime" usually refers to offenses that are nonviolent and committed by professionals, public officials, and other citizens. Examples of white collar crimes are embezzlement, theft, and fraud. Conviction for a white collar crime carries major penalties, including restitution, fines, prison time, or jail time.

Defending a white collar crime is different from building a defense for someone charged with a violent crime. The bigger the amount in question, the greater the chances of punishment. The consequences of a white collar crime are very serious and could permanently alter your life. You should hire an aggressive lawyer who knows how to handle white collar crimes and their defenses.

The Law Offices of David M. Boertje knows how to properly investigate theft and embezzlement cases and can uncover any evidence that will support your defense. We are licensed to practice in federal court and state court and can represent you in your white collar crime case during the entire process. If there is an overwhelming amount of evidence that shows that going to trial might not be to your benefit, we know how to negotiate your white collar crime case and we will do our best to minimize any potential penalties.

We frequently find that clients that are charged with white collar crimes and theft are good citizens that have made errors in judgment. We will do our best to resolve your case as efficiently and rapidly as we can. We will combine proven solutions with creative strategies. We will not judge you because you have been charged with a crime. It is important to resolve your case and reach the most favorable outcome so you can get on with your life.

Contact Our Law Firm to Speak with a Criminal Lawyer

To speak with Criminal Attorney David M. Boertje for answers to your questions related to your white collar crime case, or any other kind of criminal law case, please contact the Law Offices of David M. Boertje. You can call us, send us an e-mail, or fill out our Contact Us page on our site. We would like to offer you a FREE CONSULTATION. We will promptly return your message.

visit Criminal Lawyer

Law attorney

california lemon law attorney

California lemon law relief for all California residents. The California lemon law (Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, and the Tanner Consumer Protection Act / California Civil Code Section 1793.2, 1793.22) was enacted to protect California consumers from having to deal with repeated repair visits back to the dealership. Has your new or used vehicle been in the shop over and over again for dealer warranty repairs? You may have a California lemon law claim and case that will allow you to return the vehicle under the California state lemon law statute for a buyback and get a refund of all the monies and payments you have made, as well as a payoff of any loan or lease balance. California lemon law cases can also settle with the manufacturer replacing the offending new lemon vehicle with a new, current year model of your choice of the same MSRP price. Any new or used vehicle that has remaining factory warranty coverage, or manufacturer “Certified Pre-Owned” used car warranty coverage may be a candidate for consumer protection under the California lemon law.

The California Lemon Law also requires that the automobile manufacturer pay for the consumer's hourly attorney's fees on a case and claim that settles for a repurchase (buyback), new replacement vehicle, or a cash settlement payment. This makes the lemon law economically feasible for consumers who would not otherwise be in a position to hire a lemon law attorney.

We are a California-based statewide lemon law firm, with offices throughout California. Our 20 years of experience with all of the automobile manufacturers, and over 9,000 successful cases makes our firm the easy choice for the consumer desiring lemon law relief with highly competent representation. Many cases are settled in as little as 10 days.

Call 1-800-225-3666 for a FREE consultation and a review of your repair documents. Find out if you have a case - today. No long questionnaire forms to fill out over the net, just one simple phone call! Our offices have settled over 9,000 California lemon law claims over 20 years. We settle over 99.7% of our cases, most with zero fees, and never any money due up-front to start your case. All of our cases are on a contingency basis, eliminating financial risk to our clients. As stated earlier, the California lemon law has a provision for attorney’s fees, making the automobile manufacturer pay the attorney for time spent on a lemon law claim/case. Call or e-mail us now! If you prefer to receive a free on-line case evaluation by our attorneys in just 1 hour, click here.

Important Consumer Notice: Arbitration is not a requirement for consumers in California to pursue a lemon law claim/case against an automobile manufacturer. Additionally, your lemon law rights extend to the entire new vehicle limited warranty period, which is typically 3 years/36,000 miles, or 4 years/50,000 miles. Don't be mislead by "information" or "instructions" or manufacturer's "lemon law booklets" that a lemon law claim must be filed within 18 months or 18,000 miles, or that you "must" go through Arbitration - this is simply not the case in California! Our lemon law offices will give you all the information you need on how to pursue a lemon law case to get your money back, or a new replacement vehicle.

Pitfalls of “do-it-yourself” Lemon Law – Owner Beware: This is where many consumers get themselves into trouble – unknowingly. If a consumer wants to pursue his/her California lemon law rights by attempting to “settle” their “case” themselves, they can expose themselves to a “settlement” that is substantially less monetarily than is afforded by the California lemon law statute. Why? If a consumer attempts to deal directly with the automobile manufacturer seeking a “buyback” of their vehicle, the automobile manufacturer has no “rule book” on lemon law to follow, but rather, can simply make any offer that they think the consumer may think is “reasonable”, or that they simply will accept. Worse yet, many vehicles have substantial safety and drivability issues that make them a unsafe lemon. Even if the automobile manufacturer was to offer a lemon law “buyback”, that does not necessarily mean the vehicle is being repurchased as a California Lemon Law buyback wherein the vehicles title is branded “lemon law buyback”. Rather, the vehicle is simply repurchased as a “goodwill” buyback, with the consumer signing a settlement document that releases the manufacturer from all “California lemon law buyback” responsibility, allowing these defective vehicles to be resold to unsuspecting consumer(s) without any “lemon law buyback” disclosure!

Having our law firm handle your lemon law case assures you that when vehicles are repurchased, they are repurchased pursuant to our California lemon law, not by a “goodwill” offer. You can eliminate all this time, hassle, downside and pitfalls by having California’s largest lemon law firm handle all this for you by simply calling us at 1-800-225-3666.

“Typical Car Dealer”: This age-old expression often rings true when it comes to the California lemon law. Car dealers are there to do one thing – and one thing only – make money. They have nothing to do with repurchasing your vehicle under the California lemon law. The automobile manufacturer is the party responsible for repurchasing vehicles under the California lemon law. Our firm has worked with the automobile manufacturers for over 20 years - so you don’t have to. We also eliminate you having to deal in any way with your car dealership.

Certified Pre-Owned Used Car Warranties: If you purchased your used vehicle from a new car franchised dealer as a “certified pre-owned” used vehicle, then you can enjoy many of the same California lemon law benefits as the new car purchaser! These factory sponsored “CPO” (Certified Pre-Owned) vehicles come with a written warranty backed by the automobile manufacturer. So, even if your vehicle is out of the manufacturer’s original “new vehicle limited warranty”, you still have California lemon law protection during the “certified pre-owned” warranty period, just like a person that purchased new! Our experts will be able to fully brief you on your rights under the California lemon law with a “CPO” vehicle, as well as tell you if you have a pursuable case.

“I want to keep my vehicle, but I also want to be compensated for all the problems” What is “Cash-and-Keep” as it applies to California lemon law cases? Our California Lemon law statute affords a vehicle repurchase, or a new replacement vehicle for the offending “lemon” vehicle. This being said, we have clients that will desire alternative settlements to a California lemon law statute repurchase or replacement. This can include “cash-and-keep”, wherein the manufacturer agrees to pay an amount to our client that is negotiated by the attorney that allows the client to retain their vehicle and put substantial “cash in their pocket”. Our law firms experience allows us to often present multiple options to settlement for our clients to choose from, thus affording the greatest range of settlement options in their California Lemon Law case.

“I want to know if the California lemon law applies to me – my vehicle is out of warranty” Our California lemon law can afford warranty protection past the factory new car limited warranty period if the consumer continues to bring the car back into the dealership for warranty repairs in a continuous manner for the unresolved repeating issue. In California, our lemon law is looking for repetition in bringing the car back for repair, establishing how serious the problems are for your lemon law case and claim. The California lemon law can also apply for a vehicle that sustained numerous repeated defect warranty repair visits during warranty, but is currently a out-of-warranty vehicle wherein that defect has been cured. These California lemon law cases are argued within the premise that the automobile manufacturer had a duty to repurchase, but failed to do so by their review of the warranty repair history of the vehicle. Call us for more details on out-of-warranty lemon law claims and cases.

For more detail visit Law attorney


Lemon Law

Need a lemon law lawyer

Norman Taylor has been practicing lemon law in California in both state and federal courts since 1987. His firms have compelled some of the largest corporations in the country to refund over one hundred million dollars for defective vehicles which include automobiles, motor homes, boats and motorcycles. Mr. Taylor and his associates are recognized nationally as the leading authorities in the subject. He has been a guest on numerous radio and television programs, including CNN and Daywatch. For information on recent Top Ten defects by manufacture and more, visit our blog.


Need a lomon law reference guide

Lemon Law-The Standard Reference Guide by Norman F. Taylor, presents a nationwide panorama of one of the most powerful consumer laws in the country. This book has an excellent summary of all 50 state’s Lemon Laws. It will simply clarify what the lemon law is. It will easily explain to you, in plain English, how you will know if you have a lemon and guide you through what you can do about it no matter what state you may live in.

This book is used by consumers, dealers and attorneys. It’s important to know you rights without all the legal terms.


For more detail visit Lemonattorney

california lemon law attorney

california lemon law attorney

Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully considered what they do not say.
~William W. Watt


Mr. Watt gives us good advice and I have looked at what my few small charts show and I do understand what they do not show. To really get into the connections between the number of Lemon Law cases and the number of vehicles sold by each manufacturer in a given year might make an interesting book. One could connect manufacturing technology, quality of process, quality of materials, the attitude of manufacturers and their dealers to consumers, unions, the effect of the quarterly report and how it drives sales, the legal ramifications of building and selling defective vehicles and on and on.

Statistics are interesting provided they show something startling or prove something your intuition suggested was a fact, but that hadn’t been proved. For example: I know, that’s know not think, that as a country and as individuals we are prisoners of our national business model. As prisoners, we are punished over and over and we feel it in that place of enduring pain, our wallets.

After spending some years teaching TQM [Total Quality Management—Deming] and SPC [Statistical Process Control] I came to the understanding that manufacturing high quality components [there are on the order of 15,000 components in the average modern automobile] is subject to considerable variation, even in the absence of the human element. That variation in the manufacture of components, the variation in the processes of assembly of those components, the variation in materials practically guarantees that a surprising percentage of all vehicles manufactured are going to result in the assembly of a Lemon Automobile. By Lemon I mean a vehicle that meets the legal tests of the various state’s Lemon Laws. The question then becomes, why does one manufacturer who produces a million vehicles produce 5% lemons and another manufacturer who also makes a million vehicles, produce less than 1% lemon vehicles. That’s an extraordinary difference. That means the 1st manufacturer made 50,000 lemons and the other made less than 10,000 lemon vehicles.

I think I know the answer and I am betting those of you who read this also have good ideas of your own. What I wanted to do here is show, very directly, that there is a correlation between manufacturing skills, manufacturing quality and the number of defective vehicles—lemons—produced by specific manufacturers. It is, I think, a good idea to temper statistics with common sense and the skilled use of the best computer available—the one between your ears.

Statistics are no substitute for judgment
—Henry Clay American Statesman, 1777-1852


Figure 1 Car & Light Truck Sales in the US for 2007
Lemona Law Graph 1

As you have noted these are sales, not production numbers. When one looks at production it will be seen that GM and Toyota are very close in total production. The reason we include production numbers is that showing the percentage of lemon law cases by manufacturer we had during 2007 is interesting but not nearly as telling as when these percentages are compared to numbers of specific makes produced.

Look at Figure 2. Assume for a moment that the total number of lemon law cases for 2007 was 1,000. Now look at the percentages for GM and Toyota. For roughly the same number of vehicles produced, there were 166 GM cases and 35 Toyota lemon law cases. Think about this in terms of money, dollars and cents. Remember, GM is in so much trouble it is closing plants and making serious efforts to get costs under control. Toyota is not closing plants, they are in fact, steadily increasing production and market share. As an American this &^^&%& me off.

Figure 2 Percentages of Lemon Law Cases by Vehicle Manufacturer 2007
2007 Auto Sales

Let’s have one more comparison to really make the point. Look at Mercedes. Their percentage of our total lemon law cases last year was 14%. That would be 140 cases based on my proposed 1,000 total cases. Now, let’s pop back up to Figure 1. We note that their total sales were 226,003 vehicles. I got the production numbers from a reliable source on the Internet.

The higher the percentage of lemon law cases for the smaller number of vehicles sold is the key point of these statistics. It is an indication that something is seriously wrong. It would be well to remember that we are but one Lemon Law firm among many all across the country. Country wide I am sure that there are differences in percentages by make. For example, while I do not know this as a fact, I would guess that more pickup trucks are sold in Alabama than Mercedes Benz. Buying habits differ. However, I doubt there would be much difference if these case statistics were from a sample that included all the lemon law firms in the US. Therefore, while only two basic statistics were used, they are in fact very revealing. I leave it to you, the reader to think about the possibilities.

Because I am an engineering-quality person by training, one key thing repeats over and over to me.
It costs a lot to make bad products.

—Anonymous

Criminal Defense Attorney & Lawyer

Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney & Lawyer

los angeles criminal defense lawyers

Schwartz and Naderi is a criminal defense firm representing clients in Los Angeles County, the San Fernando Valley, Ventura County, and all across California.

Regardless of the nature of your legal problem, working with an experienced Los Angeles criminal defense attorney is the first and crucial step toward a favorable resolution of your legal matter ranging from traffic tickets and DUI's to all misdemeanor and felony charges.

Why we are different:

When you hire a criminal defense team to fight for you, you expect more than a
single Los Angeles criminal defense attorney handling your case. That is what we provide, a team of criminal defense attorneys.

Schwartz and Naderi has a unique approach to criminal defense. We understand that every case we accept is different, not only with regards to the facts, but also with regards to the circumstances, the parties involved, the prosecutors, and the law. We treat every case as such.

Your case will be under constant supervision by our experienced criminal defense attorneys, not law clerks, and not legal assistants. When you hire us, you hire a personal criminal defense attorney. We will review and investigate your case and make determinations and recommendations. We will answer your questions and walk you through the process. A lot of lawyers tend to "Disappear" and become tough to get a hold of once they are paid. Not with us. We have a strict callback policy that we adhere to. Other firms do not.

There will be a number of experienced criminal defense lawyers working on your case at any given point in time. This ensures that all bases are covered and leads to our ultimate goal. Your protection and best interest.

Our approach is unique. This will be the ultimate line of defense when you or a family member are thrown into these tough and turbulent times.

Do not hesitate. We are here to aggressively fight for you. For a free consultation, feel free to call my office or fill out the online form for an immediate response. The right lawyer does make the difference.


LEGAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURE

STEP BY STEP LEGAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURE

When a crime has been committed and the police have been sent for, and there is a suspect who is identified to the police, the police will endeavor to apprehend that suspect and make an arrest.

The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution necessitates that there be probable cause to arrest somebody. Probable cause for an arrest subsists when the facts and circumstances are such that a person of ordinary caution or prudence would believe and reliably entertain a strong suspicion of the guilt of the accused, so much that the suspect should be taken into custody to stand trial. Before the police can arrest anyone, and before a judge can issue an arrest warrant there must be probable cause. An oral complaint to a police officer by a victim of, or witness to, a crime can be enough to support probable cause.

Although there may not be enough evidence of probable cause, the police may stop and keep a person in custody to conduct a brief investigation. To do this the police must have some reasonable suspicion that a crime is being, is about to be or has been committed. This reasonable suspicion must be based upon specific and logical facts.

Normally, the police can arrest someone for any felony committed in their presence or reported to them, and any misdemeanor or infraction committed in their presence. Generally, by statute, the police cannot arrest for misdemeanors or infractions not committed in their presence (with the exception of violations of domestic violence restraining orders, domestic violence offenses, possession of a dangerous or deadly weapon within an airport, assault and battery upon a firefighter or paramedic, some driving under the influence offenses, and jail escapees). Instead, the victim or a witness to the crime may perform a citizen's arrest, in which they would arrest the suspect and immediately turn the suspect over to the police, who handle transport and booking.

"Miranda" Rights
What rights do you have? Whether you are an adult citizen or non-citizen, you have certain rights if you are arrested. Before the law enforcement officer questions you during a custodial interrogation, he or she should read you your "Miranda" Rights:

1. You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions. Do you understand?
2. Anything you do say may be used against you in a court of law. Do you understand?
3. You have the right to consult an attorney before speaking to the police and to have an attorney present during questioning now or in the future. Do you understand?
4. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you wish. Do you understand?
5. If you decide to answer questions now without an attorney present you will still have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to an attorney. Do you understand?
6. Knowing and understanding your rights as I have explained them to you, are you willing to answer my questions without an attorney present?
These are your "Miranda" rights, guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. If you are not given these warnings, your lawyer can ask that any statements you made to the police not be used against you in court. But this does not necessarily mean that your case will be dismissed. And this does not apply if you volunteer information without being questioned by the police. It advised to you that, in the event you are ever put into the situation to have a law enforcement officer read you your rights, you immediately inform him or her that you do not wish to speak to them, or make a statement, without an attorney present. By law, at that request, they are not allowed to question you any further. You can be questioned, without a lawyer present, only if you voluntarily give up your rights and if you understand what you are giving up. NEVER GIVE UP YOUR

CRIMINAL DEFENSE PRACTICE

los angeles criminal defense lawyers


When you are accused of a crime in California, the full power of the government is at the prosecutor's disposal to convict you.

I help level the playing field and protect your legal rights. That's important when your reputation, your job and your freedom are on the line.

CRIMINAL DEFENSE PRACTICE

STATE AND FEDERAL

FELONIES AND MISDEMEANORS


  • Domestic Violence
  • Spousal Abuse
  • Embezzlement / Theft
  • Forgery & Check Fraud
  • Juvenile
  • DUI & DMV Hearings
  • Drug Cases
  • Internet Crimes
  • Illegal Search and Seizure
  • Administrative Hearings
  • Murder / Assault
  • Three-Strikes Cases
  • Sexual Misconduct
  • Solicitation of Prostitution
  • Guns & Weapons Cases
  • Probation / Parole Violations
  • State & Federal Warrants
  • Accidents / Hit & Run
  • Sentencing Hearings
  • Federal Charges
  • Grand Jury Subpoenas


  • Experience

    • 30 years practicing in the courts of Long Beach and the surrounding areas.I know our court system, local judges, clerks and prosecutors.
    • Over 200 bench trials and over 100 jury trials. Many lawyers have never tried a case before a jury.
    • Widely recognized. Selected 2002 Lawyer of the Year, Long Beach Bar Association; voted 2004 and 2005 Southern California "Super Lawyer," per Los Angeles Magazine; "AV Rated" by Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory (highest possible rating for legal ability and ethical standards).

    Principles

    • Personal attention. I personally handle every case and my staff and I are available to our clients. Phone calls are returned promptly.
    • Selective practice. We do not run a client mill - every case is important to us and we limit our caseload so that every client can get priority attention.
    • I understand the stakes. Many of our clients are in the fight of their lives. My staff and I are with them every step of the way.